Prince Harry slams UK Security after Al-Qaeda threats

“This is not just about Harry,” a legal spokesperson noted. “It’s about the principle that no one should be treated unfairly or inconsistently when it comes to their security — especially when there are known threats.”
Prince Harry has sharply criticized the UK government’s decision to deny him police protection, calling the security arrangements “inadequate, inappropriate, and ineffective,” according to newly revealed court documents.
The Duke of Sussex has been locked in a legal battle with the Home Office after he was stripped of publicly funded police protection upon stepping down from royal duties in 2020.
The revelations emerged during a hearing at the Court of Appeal, where Harry’s legal team argued that the decision-making process by the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) was flawed and failed to follow proper procedures.
His lawyers claimed that the committee did not consult its risk management board or adequately consider his unique security needs, despite credible threats against him.
One of the most alarming aspects of the case is the disclosure of a threat from al-Qaeda.
Intelligence reports reportedly revealed that the terrorist organization had referenced Harry due to his military service in Afghanistan, stating that "killing him would satisfy the Muslim nation."
Despite this, the government withdrew his security detail, asserting that he was no longer a working royal and no longer entitled to the same level of protection.
Prince Harry had offered to personally fund police protection for himself and his family during visits to the UK, but this offer was also rejected.
He has since expressed concern over the safety of his wife, Meghan, and their children when traveling to the UK, insisting that the current arrangement places them at risk.
"This is not just about Harry," a legal spokesperson noted.
"It’s about the principle that no one should be treated unfairly or inconsistently when it comes to their security, especially when there are known threats."
The court is expected to deliver a ruling on the appeal in the coming weeks.
Legal experts suggest that the case could set a precedent for how high-profile figures are protected, even after stepping down from official roles.
In the meantime, the Duke continues to push for what he sees as a justified and necessary step to ensure his family's safety while in the UK.